Journal of Water Research in Agriculture

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

sub

forms

The general format of preparing an article

Referral instructions

Sample files

publonse

davar

Effect of Irrigation Scheduling and Nitrogen Rates on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Corn in Guilan Province

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Effect of Irrigation Scheduling and Nitrogen Rates on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Corn in Guilan Province

2 Department of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan Branch, Lahijan, Iran;

3 Department of Irrigation, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar Branch, Shoushtar, Iran;

10.22092/jwra.2013.131428

Abstract

In order to study the effects of irrigation interval and nitrogen rates on yield and water use efficiency (WUE) of maize (Zea mays L) using KSC704 maize hybrid, an experiment was conducted in agricultural research farm of Lahidjan, Guilan, north of Iran, using split plot in randomized complete block design with three replications, during 2010. The main plots were three irrigation regimes including rainfed and irrigation intervals of 6 and 12 days. The sub-plots were five nitrogen rates consisting of 0, 60, 120, 180, and 240 kg N/ha. The results indicated that the effects of irrigation, nitrogen, and their interaction on grain yield, biomass, biomass WUE, and seed yield WUE were significant at α=1%. The highest biomass WUE and grain yield WUE were 6.82 and 2.92 kg/m3, obtained from application of, respectively, 180 and 240 kg N/ha-1 under rainfed conditions. Higher rates of nitrogen and application of irrigation led to increase in seed yield and biomass, but, differences between irrigation intervals of 6 and 12 days and N180 and N240 fertilizers treatments were not significant. The lowest grain yield and biomass were observed in rainfed condition with no N application. Stomata conductivities were significantly higher in the 6-day irrigation interval. The lowest relative water content belonged to rainfed treatment.

Keywords

References
  • Ahyaei, A.A. and Behbahanizadeh, M. 1993. Methods of soil chemical analysis. Volume (1), Soil and Water Research Institute, Tehran.
  • Alizadeh, A. Majidi. A. Nadian, H. Noormohammadi, GH. And Ameriyan, M. 2007. Effect of drought stress and different nitrogen levels on phenology and growth of maize. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Volume (4), Number (5).
  • Berenguer, P. Sativeri, F. Boixadera, J. and LIoreras, J. 2009. Nitrogen fertilization of irrigated maize under Mediterranean conditions. Europe Journal Agronomy. 30: 163-171.
  • Bredemeier, C. 2005. Laser-induced chlorophyll fluorescence sensing as a tool for site-specific nitrogen fertilizer evaluation under controlled environmental, Munich. 217 P. Ph.D. Thesis.
  • Cakir, R. 2004. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crop Research. 89: 1-16.
  • Diepenbrock, W. 2000. Yield analysis of water oilseed rape. A review. Field Crop Research. 67: 35-49.
  • Dordas, C.A., Sioulas, C. 2008. Safflower yield, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency response to nitrogen fertilization under rainfed conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 27, 75–85.
  • Earl, H. J. and Davis, R.F. 2003. Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of Maize. Agronomy Journal. 95: 688-696.
  • Ezadi, M. And Imam, Y. 2010. Planting pattern, plant density and nitrogen levels on grain yield and yield components of maize single cross 704. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. Volume (12), Issue 3.
  • Gheysari, M. S. Mirlatifi, M. Bannayan, M. Homaee, M. and Hoogenboom, G. 2009. Interaction of water and nitrogen on Maize for silage. Agriculture Water Management. 96: 809-821.
  • Gubis, J. Vankova, R. Cervena, V. Dragunova, M. Hudcavicova, M. lichtnerova, H. Dokupil, T. and Jurekova, Z. 2007. Transformed tobacco plants with increased tolerance to draught. South African Journal, Bat. 73: 505-511.
  • Hussain, G. H. and Al-Jaloud, A. 1998. Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen on Yield, Yield Components and water use efficiency of barly in Saudi Arabia.  Agric Water Management. 36: 55-70.
  • Igbadum, H. E. Tarimo, A. K. P. R. Salim, B. A. and Mahoo H.F. 2007. Evaluation of selected crop water production functions for an irrigated Maize crop. Agric Water Management. 94: 1-10.
  • Karimi, A. Homari, M. Mazardelan, M. Liaqat, A. And Raeisi, F. 2006. Effect of fertilizer - irrigation on corn yield and water use efficiency of drip irrigation method- manuscript. Journal of Agricultural Science, Year (12), Number (3).
  • Karimi, M. Esfahani, M. Bigoei, M. Rabiei, B. And Ghasemi Kafi, A. 2009. The effect of deficit irrigation treatments Brsfat morphological and growth parameters of maize silage in Rasht weather conditions. Electronic journal produced crops. Volume (2), Issue (2),91-110.
  • Katerji, N. J. Hoorn, W. Hamdy, A. and Mastroilli, M. 2004. Comparison of corn Yield response to Plant water stress Caused by salinity and by drought. Agriculture Water Manage,. 65: 95-107.
  • Khodabandeh, N. 2000. Cereals. Tehran University Press, 537 pp.
  • Majidian, Ghalavand, A.Karimian, N. AndHaghighi, A. 2008. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer, manure andirrigation wateryield andyield components ofmaize.Electronic Journal ofcrop production. Volume (1),Issue(2), 67-86.
  • Major, D.J., Baumeister, R., Toure, A., and S. Zhao. 2003. Digital imaging and spectral techniques (Application to precision agriculture and crop physiology). ASA-CSSA-SSSA. Special Publication, Madison. USA. pp: 81-93.
  • Mansouri-Far, C. Modarres sanavy, S. A. M. and Saberali, S.F. 2010. Maize Yield response to deficit irrigation during Low Sensitive growth stages and nitrogen rate under semi-arid climatic conditions. Agric Water Manage,. 97: 12-22.
  • Mekonen, A. 2011. Deficit irrigation practices as alternative means of improving water use efficiencies in irrigated agriculture:case study of maize crop at Arba Minch Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol 6, 2: 226-235.
  • Montajebi, N. AndVaziri, ZH.Effect ofirrigationschedulingon yield andwater use efficiencyof wheat inGolpayegan.Journalof SoilandWaterSciences. Volume(18).Number (1).
  • Moser, S. B. Feil, B. Jampatong, S. and Stamp, P. 2006. Effects of pre-anthesis drought nitrogen fertilizer rate and variety on grain yield, yield components, and harvest index of tropical maize. Agric Water Management. 81:41-58.
  • O,Neil, P. M. Shanahan, J. F. Shepers, J. S. and Caldwel, B. 2004. Agronemic responses of corn hybrids from different areas to deficit and adequate level of water and nitrogen. Agron Journal. 96: 1660-1667.
  • Osborne, S. L. Schepers, J. S. Francis, D. D. and Schlemmer, M.R. 2002. Use of spectral radiance to in season biomass and grain yield in nitrogen and water stressed corn. Crop Science. 42: 165-171.
  • Pandey, R. K. Maranville, J. W. and Chetima, M.M. 2000. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effect on maize in a sahelian environment. Shoot growth. Agric Water Manage,. 46: 15-27.
  • Sharmasarkar, F. C. Sharmasarkar, S. Miller, S. D. Vance, G. F, and Zhang, R. 2001. Assesment of drip and flood irrigation on water and fertilizer use efficiencies for sugar beets. Agric Water Manage,. 46: 241-251.
  • Sheafer, C. C. Halgerson, J. L. and Jung, H.G. 2006. Hybrid an N fertilization affects corn silage yield and quality. J, Agronomy and Crop Science. 192: 278-283.
  • Sing, N.P., and S.K. Sinka. 1997. Water use efficiency in crop production. In: Water requirement and irrigation management of crops in India, ed. Water technology center. Pp, 289-335. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.
  • Sioseh Mardeh, A. Ahmadi, A. Postini, K. And h. Ebrahimzadeh, H. 2005. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitation of photosynthesis and its relation with drought-resistant wheat varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science. Volume (35). Number (1).
  • Stanhill, G. 1986. Water use efficiency. Adv. Agron., 39: 53-85.
  • Struike, P. G. Dooregeest, M. and Boonman, J.G. 1986. Environmental effects on flowering characteristics and kernel set of Maize. Journal of Agriculture Science. 34: 469-484.
  • Vaezi, A. Homaei, M. And Malekoti, M. 2002. Effect of fertilizer - fertilizer and irrigation water use efficiency in forage maize. Journal of Soil Water Sciences, Volume (16), Issue (2), pp. 152-160.
  • Villar-Mir, J. M. Villar-Mir, P. Stockle, C. O. Ferrer, F. and Aran, M. 2002. On-farm monitoring of soil nitrate-nitrogen in irrigated cornfields in the Ebro valley (Northeast Spain). Agron Journal., 94: 373–380.
  • Weatherly, P. E. and Barrs, C. 1965. A re-examination of the relative turgidity thechnique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Australia J Biology Science. 15: 413-428.
Journal of Water Research in Agriculture
Volume 26, Issue 4
June 2013
Pages 469-482
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics