Effect of Different Amounts of Water and N-fertilizer on Peanut Yield and Its Components

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Water Science and Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Young Researchers Club, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran

3 PhD candidate in Irrigation and Drainage, Water Sci. and Eng. Dept., College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran,

Abstract

Proper and efficient use of water and fertilizers, in addition to increasing productivity, increase crop yield. In order to study the effects of drip irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer levels on yield of peanut, an experimen was conducted in Astaneh Ashrafiyeh, Guilan province, in 2012 and 2013 using split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main plot included water treatments consisting of no irrigation and application of 60%, 80%, and 100 percent water requirement. Sub plots included nitrogen fertilizer levels i.e. 0, 30, 60 and 90 kg.ha-1. The results showed that pod yield were similar in treatments of %80 and 100 percent crop water requirement corresponding to 2385 and 2452 kg.ha-1 in 2012. In 2013, the yields were, respectively, 2383 and 2448 kg.ha-1. The highest pod yield was obtained in 60 kg.N.ha-1 treatment in 2012 and 2013, amounting to, respectively, 2351 and 2667 kg.ha-1. Seed yields in 2012 and 2013 were obtained in 100 percent crop water requirement, with 1885 and 1877 kg.ha-1, respectively, which were significantly higher compared to the treatment without irrigation. In the fertilizer treatments, the average yield of 60 kg N.ha-1 in 2012 and 2013 was, respectively, 1829 and 2012 kg.ha-1. In water treatments, water productivity based on biomass yield varied between 1.03 and 1.68 kg.m-3 and, based on pod yield, it was observed between 0.37 and 0.63 kg.m-3, in 2012 and 2013. The water productivity values of seed yield in the 100% water requirement in the crop years 2012 and 2013 were 0.28 and 0.40 kg.m-3, respectively. Therefore, considering the results of yield and water productivity, management practice of 100% water requirement and 60 kg.N.ha-1 is the most appropriate method for peanut cultivation in the study area.

Keywords


  1. اخوان، ک. محمدرضا شیری و فراهم کاظمی آذر. 1393. اثرمیزان آب آبیاری قطره­ای و آرایش کاشت بر عملکرد ذرت دانه­ای. نشریه پژوهش آب در کشاورزی. ب. جلد 28. شماره 1. 97-105.
  2. بابازاده، ح. عبدزادگوهری، ع.، خنک، آ. اثر مدیریت آبیاری و سطوح مختلف مالچ کاه بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد گیاه لوبیا. نشریه پژوهش آب در کشاورزی. ب. جلد 29 .شماره 2.129-140.
  3. حسین زاد ج.، سلامی ح.، و صدر ک. 1386. برآورد ارزش اقتصادی آب در تولید محصولات زراعی با استفاده از توابع تولید انعطاف پذیر مطالعه موردی: دشت مراغه بناب. مجله دانش کشاورزی، 17.14-1:(2).
  4. خیری، ح. 1366. زراعت بادام زمینی. سازمان ترویج کشاورزی. انتشارات فنی. چاپ اول. 66 صفحه.
  5. عبدزادگوهری، ع. 1394. عکس العمل گیاه بادام­زمینی در روش های مختلف آبیاری. کنفرانس بین المللی پژوهش در مهندسی، علوم و تکنولوژی. استانبول. 4 صفحه.
  6. عبدزادگوهری، ع. امیری، ا. و ک. مجد سلیمی.1390. ارزیابی عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب در بادام­زمینی تحت سطوح مختلف آبیاری و کود نیتروژن. نشریه آب و خاک (علوم و صنایع کشاورزی). جلد 25، شماره 5، آذر و دی 1390، 944-1004.
  7. عبدزادگوهری، ع.، امیری، ا. 1389. تاثیر کود نیتروژن و آبیاری متناوب بر گیاه بادام­زمینی. یازدهمین کنگره علوم زراعت و اصلاح نباتات ایران. 2391-2394.
  8. کریمی،ا.، همائی، م.، معزاردلان، م.، لیاقت، ع. و رئیسی، ف. 1385. اثر کود- آبیاری بر عملکرد و کارآیی مصرف آب در ذرت به روش آبیاری قطره­ای- خطی. مجله علمی- پژوهشی علوم کشاورزی سال دوازدهم. شماره3 .575-561.
  9. محمدی، م. 1385. خاک­شناسی کشاورزی، انتشارات مرکز نشر سپهر. چاپ اول. 151 صفحه.
  10. Arunyanark, A., Jogloy, S., Akkasaeng, C., Vorasoot, N., Kesmala, T., Nageswara Rao, R.C., Wright, G.C., and A. Patanothai. 2008. Chlorophyll stability is an indicator of drought tolerance in peanut. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 194, 113–125.
  11. Bonari, E., annozzi, G.P.V.V Benvenuti, A. and M. Baldini .1992. Modern aspects of   sunflower cultivation technigues. Proc. 12th, Sunf, Pisa. Italy.
  12. Boontang, S., Girdthai, T., Jogloy, S., Akkasaeng, C., Vorasoot, N., Patanothai, A., and N., Tantisuwichwong. 2010. Responses of released cultivars of peanut to terminal drought for traits related to drought tolerance. Asian J. Plant Sci. 9, 423–431.
  13. FAO .2013. FAOSTAT. Available online: http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx# ancor.
  14. Girdthai, T., Jogloy, S., Vorasoot, N., Akkasaeng, C., Wongkaew, S., Holbrook, C.C., A., and Patanothai. 2010. Associations between physiological traits for drought tolerance and aflatoxin contamination in peanut genotypes under terminal drought. Plant Breed. 129, 693–699.
  15. Huang, Q., Rozelle, S., and R., Howitt. 2006. Irrigation water pricing policy in China. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting. July 23-26, Long beach, California.
  16. Jongrungklang, N., Toomsan, B., Vorasoot, N., Jogloy, S., Boote, K.J., Hoogenboom, G., and A., Patanothai. 2011. Rooting traits of peanut genotypes with different yield responses to pre-flowering drought stress. Field Crops Res. 120, 262–270.
  17. Nigam, S.N., Chandra, S., Rupa Sridevi, K., Manoha Bhukta, A., Reddy, G.S., Nageswara Rao, R.C., Wright, G.C., Reddy, P.V., Deshmukh, M.P., Mathur, R.K., Basu, M.S., Vasundhara, S., Vindhiya Varman, P., and A.K., Nagda. 2005. Efficiency of physiological trait-based and empirical selection approaches for drought tolerance in groundnut. Ann. Appl. Biol. 146, 433–439.
  18. Pimratch,S., Jogloy, Toomsan, S. Jaisil, B. Sikhinarum, P. Kesmala, J. and A., Patanothai. 2004. Heritability and correlation for nitrogen fixation and agronomic traits of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Songklanakarin J  Sci Technol. 26 (3): 305-315.
  19. Puangbut, D., Jogloy, S., Toomsan, B., Vorasoot, N., Akkasaeng, C., Kesmala, T.R., Rachaputi, C.N., Wright, G.C., and A., Patanothai. 2010. Physiological basis for genotypic variation in tolerance to and recovery from pre-flowering drought in peanut. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 196, 358–367.
  20. Shinde, B.M. and L., Laware. 2010. Effect of drought stress on agronomic Contributing characters In Groundnut (Arachis Hypogae L.). Asian. J. Exp. Biol. Sci. Vol1: 968-971.
  21. Shinde, B.M., Limaye, A.S., Deore, G.B. and L. Laware. 2010. Physiological response of groundnut (Arachis Hypogae) varieties to drought stress. Asin J. Exp.Biol.SCI. SPL. 65-68.