Mohammad saeid Jafari; Hamideh Noory; Abdol-Majid Liaghat; Hamed Ebrahimian
Abstract
Lettuce is one of the most important leafy vegetables used primarily for fresh and salad applications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different levels of water and nitrogen on lettuce yield and find the best irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer practices for producing this crop ...
Read More
Lettuce is one of the most important leafy vegetables used primarily for fresh and salad applications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different levels of water and nitrogen on lettuce yield and find the best irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer practices for producing this crop in drip irrigation. Iceberg variety of lettuce was planted in 2018 with three irrigation treatments (I1, I2 and I3 to provide 100%, 80%, and 60% of crop evapotranspiration, ETa, respectively) and four nitrogen treatments (N1, N2, N3, and N4 to provide 105, 70, 35 and zero kg of nitrogen per hectare in total, respectively). In 2019, two irrigation treatments (I1 and I3) and two nitrogen treatments (N1 and N4) were used. The experiment had a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results indicated that the effect of irrigation and nitrogen treatments and their interactions on the marketable yield of lettuce; but the dry matter produced was only affected by irrigation and nitrogen treatments. Maximum marketable yield and dry matter production were 66.1 ton.ha-1 and 2728.2 kg.ha-1 for full irrigation treatment with 105 kg.ha-1 nitrogen (I1N1) treatment, respectively. The minimum marketable yield and dry matter were 37.5 ton.ha-1 and 1929.6 kg.ha-1 for 60% ETa treatment with 35 kg.ha-1 nitrogen (I3N3) treatment, respectively. The maximum and minimum irrigation water productivities for marketable yield were 21.63 and 15.38 kg.m-3 for I2N1 and I3N3 treatments, respectively. The linear and nonlinear production functions of yield-water and yield-nitrogen were obtained for lettuce variety Iceberg, which can be used in similar environmental conditions in research and practical applications.
4
Moazzam Hassanpour Asil; Jamalali Olfati; Mohammadreza Khaledian; Zahra-Sadat Nabavi Mohajer
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of fertigation with different levels of nutrient solutions and different irrigation regimes on water productivity (ratio of yield to water containing nutrients) in greenhouse lily cultivation. The experiment was conducted in two years at the ...
Read More
The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of fertigation with different levels of nutrient solutions and different irrigation regimes on water productivity (ratio of yield to water containing nutrients) in greenhouse lily cultivation. The experiment was conducted in two years at the University of Guilan. In the first year, the best treatment was determined among four different concentrations of nutrient solution according to Coic solution including S1, S2, S3, and S4. The results of mean comparison showed that S1 treatment (treatment with the highest concentration of nutrients) had a positive effect on most vegetative, reproductive, and postharvest characteristics of lily. In the second year, with appropriate nutrient solution and three different levels including S11, S12, and S13, different irrigation regimes according to field capacity percent (%FC) were considered. Four different irrigation regimes including 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% FC were applied. The results of the second experiment showed that application of deficit irrigation treatments including 90%, 80%, and 70% of FC increased water productivity without any significant effects on the vegetative and reproductive characteristics. The results also showed that irrigation treatments had significant effects on traits such as vase life, which was increased by decreasing water consumption and increasing nutrient concentration. Regarding the vegetative characteristics of lily plants, the data showed that traits such as fresh and dry weights of roots, leaves, and flowers were positively affected by decreasing irrigation levels and increasing concentration of nutrient solution, while plant height and both number and weight of daughter bulbs were not affected by these treatments. The highest water productivity (nutrients solutions) was obtained in the S3 and 80% FC, being 21.57 kg/m3.
7
Saber Jamali; Hossein Ansari; Abbas Safarizadeh-sani
Abstract
Peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) is used for medicinal and food purposes. Its cultivation has economic importance, due to its ability to produce and store essential oil. This research was conducted to study the effect of deficit irrigation and magnetized water on yield and yield components of peppermint ...
Read More
Peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) is used for medicinal and food purposes. Its cultivation has economic importance, due to its ability to produce and store essential oil. This research was conducted to study the effect of deficit irrigation and magnetized water on yield and yield components of peppermint in the experimental research greenhouse of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, during 2018-19. We used a factorial experiment based on the completely randomized design with 3 replications. Irrigation levels consisted of 4 levels (100%, 85%, 70%, and 55% of plant water requirements) and magnetic field factors consisted of 3 levels (0, 0.3, and 0.6 teslas). The result showed that decrease of the water requirement by 15%, 30%, and 45% resulted in reduction of shoot fresh weights by 11.2%, 15.1%, and 36.5%, respectively. However, irrigation with magnetized water (0.3 teslas) under deficit irrigation levels (85%, 70%, and 55% of plant water requirements) resulted in the increase of shoot dry weights by 19.5%, 24.7%, and 66.4%, respectively. In general, the use of magnetic water under water stress enhanced plant growth and improved dry and wet shoot yield in peppermint compared to the control treatment under deficit irrigation conditions.
mahdi mokari; Meysam Abedinpour; hadi dehghan
Abstract
Presently, the main challenge of agricultural sector is improvement of crop water productivity (CWP). To evaluate the effect of water stress and planting date on grain yield, water productivity and yield components of wheat (Pishgam var.), an experiment was conducted as split plot based on complete ...
Read More
Presently, the main challenge of agricultural sector is improvement of crop water productivity (CWP). To evaluate the effect of water stress and planting date on grain yield, water productivity and yield components of wheat (Pishgam var.), an experiment was conducted as split plot based on complete randomized design with three replications, at Kashmar Agricultural Research Station, in 2018-2019. Irrigation treatments included 100% of irrigation water requirement (IWR), 80% IWR, 60% IWR, and 40% IWR as the main treatments, and three planting dates including 23rd September, 23rd October and 23rd November as sub treatments. The results showed that water stress had significant effect on grain yield, water use efficiency (WUE), and harvest index (HI) at 1% probability level, such that with increasing water stress, the grain yield, HI and WUE was decreased. Also, the results showed that the effect of sowing date on grain yield, thousand kernel weight, and number of kernels per panicle, HI, and WUE was significant. The highest values of grain yield, HI, and WUE were 7227.33 kg/ha, 32.77 %, and 2.51 kg/m3, respectively, and belonged to 23rd October and 100% IWR treatment. The lowest of these values were 2000 kg/ha, 15.3%, and 1.14 kg/m3, respectively, related to 23rd November and 40% IWR treatment. The interaction between water stress and planting date had significant effect on all agronomic traits, except the number of kernels per panicle and WUE. According to the results of this study, irrigation treatment of 100% IWR and planting date of 23rd October can be considered for autumn wheat cultivar (Pishgam var.) in arid and semi-arid region of Kashmar.
Praiya Rashki; halime piri; Eisa khammari
Abstract
In this study, the effect of different levels of irrigation water and potassium fertilizer on Roselle was investigated. The experiment was conducted using split plot design with four levels of irrigation water (I1, I2, I3 and I4 equivalent to 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% crop water requirement) and three ...
Read More
In this study, the effect of different levels of irrigation water and potassium fertilizer on Roselle was investigated. The experiment was conducted using split plot design with four levels of irrigation water (I1, I2, I3 and I4 equivalent to 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% crop water requirement) and three levels of potassium (K1, K2 and K3 equivalent 50%, 75%, and 100% potassium requirement) as sub-plot. At the end of experiment, quantitative parameters of plant including height, weight and number of capsules, dry yield, and water use efficiency were measured. Also, qualitative parameters including anthocyanin, protein, and carbohydrate content were measured to investigate the effects of water stress and fertilizer on Roselle quality. The results showed that the simple effects of irrigation water and potassium fertilizer were significant (P <0.01) on all measured parameters. The highest yield was obtained from 100% potassium fertilizer treatments and 80% water requirement. The highest water use efficiency was obtained in 60% water requirement plus 100% potassium fertilizer application, but no significant difference was found between 60% and 80% water requirement. The anthocyanin, protein, and carbohydrate contents increased with decreasing irrigation water depth to 60% of plant water requirement and decreasing potassium fertilizer application. However, there was no significant difference between 50% and 75% K fertilizer application. Therefore, due to the water status of the region and the reduction in water resources, application of 80% water requirement reduces water consumption and 75% potassium fertilizer increases quality and mitigates effect of drought stress in Roselle.
Farshad Khashaei; Javad Behmanesh; Vahid Rezaverdinejad; Nasrin Azad
Abstract
Use of subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) in row plants is increasing due to higher water and fertilizer efficiency. In order to investigate the effect of SDI levels and nitrogen fertilizer splitting on yield, yield components and water productivity of corn, a field study was conducted in 2018 as split ...
Read More
Use of subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) in row plants is increasing due to higher water and fertilizer efficiency. In order to investigate the effect of SDI levels and nitrogen fertilizer splitting on yield, yield components and water productivity of corn, a field study was conducted in 2018 as split plot experiment based on a completely randomized block design with three replications at the research farm of Urmia University. The main plots of this experiment including three irrigation levels: 100%, 75% and 50% of net irrigation requirement and subplots included three nitrogen fertilizer split applications as: weekly, every other week and three times during growing season as urea fertilizer. Based on the results, the effect of irrigation levels treatment and number of fertilizer splitting on yield, yield components and water productivity were significant at 1% level. However, the effect of fertilizer splitting on water productivity was not significant. Interaction effects of the two variable treatments on plant height and leaf area index were significant at 1% level but did not significantly affect grain yield, biomass and water productivity. The highest grain yield and corn biomass were obtained with 22.39 and 39.85 ton/ha for complete irrigation, respectively. Also, the grain yield and biomass in the three- split treatments were highest with 18.47 and 32.56 ton/ha, respectively. The highest water productivity was obtained by irrigation application of 75% of net water requirement. It seems that in regions with water scarcity, applying deficit irrigation equal to 75% of the corn irrigation requirement, can be a good solution for saving water and achieving high water productivity. Also, fertilizer injection with higher amounts and less frequency especially at the sensitive growth stages, can be a more effective solution than using lower amounts with more frequent fertilizer application.
mahdi mokari; hadi dehghan; Meysam Abedinpour
Abstract
The simultaneous effect of salinity and drought stress are among the major factors that limit agricultural production in many parts of the world, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. Accordingly, a greenhouse research was carried out to study the simultaneous effect of salinity and water stress ...
Read More
The simultaneous effect of salinity and drought stress are among the major factors that limit agricultural production in many parts of the world, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. Accordingly, a greenhouse research was carried out to study the simultaneous effect of salinity and water stress on yield and yield components of turnip (Purple Top White Globe var.) in Kashmar region. The experiment was performed as factorial arrangement in completely randomized design with three replications including two factors; salinity and irrigation water volume. Treatments consisted of four levels of water salinity (S1=0.7, S2=4, S3=8 and S4=12 dS/m) and three levels of water (W1=100%, W2=75% and W3=50 percent of water requirement), which were applied in a sandy-loam soil texture. The results showed that effects of salinity and water stress and their interaction were significant on biomass, shoot wet biomass, tuber and leaf dry weight (P<0.01). W1S1 and W2S1 treatments had higher biomass than the others. In all of the salinity levels, there was no significant difference between biomass in W1 and W2 irrigation levels. Based on the results of this research it could be concluded that turnip is more sensitive to salinity stress than drought stress. In other words, the results showed that the best level of salinity to reach the maximum biomass was S1. Therefore, the best treatment recommended for turnip planting in Kashmar region is W2S1.
mahdi fallah; Mohammad Shayannejad; Mohammad Hassan Rahimian
Abstract
Pistachio is the most important export product of Iranian agricultural sector. This product is very important because of valuation, job creation, value added as well as tolerance to salinity and drought. The purpose of this study was to investigate and analyze the evapotranspiration of pistachio (ETc ...
Read More
Pistachio is the most important export product of Iranian agricultural sector. This product is very important because of valuation, job creation, value added as well as tolerance to salinity and drought. The purpose of this study was to investigate and analyze the evapotranspiration of pistachio (ETc and ETa), gross water requirement (IWR), and depth or volume of water used in pistachios (AW) in several selected gardens in Bahadoran region of Yazd province. The study area is one of the pistachio growing centers in Yazd province. The results show that the total annual irrigation water depth in the selected orchards varies from 823 to 1600 mm (equal to 0.27 to 0.57 L/s/ha). However, due to the salinity of irrigation water and to overcome the problems of accumulation of salts in the soil, the hydromodule necessary to supply the water needed for pistachios varies from 0.6 to more than 1 L/s/ha. According to the critical condition of the water resources in the plain, it is virtually impossible to provide it. Also, by using Surface Energy Balance Algorithm, the actual evapotranspiration of pistachios during the growing season was 556 mm for the whole study area and 672 mm for the selected orchards. Regarding the comparisons between pistachio water demand, actual evapotranspiration, and volume of water used in the selected orchards, a managed deficit irrigation strategy can be recommended for the study area. Optimization of traditional irrigation systems, changes in water utilization system with the aim of reducing irrigation interval, considering the spatial variations of pistachio water requirement in the region, off-season leaching, and implementation of proper management at the orchard level are among the solutions that can be useful in overcoming the salinity and water shortage problems and prevent product loss.
halime piri; Abolfazl Bameri
Abstract
In this research, the effect of different levels of irrigation water, nitrogen fertilizer, and cow manure on garlic was investigated. The experiments were carried out in a split-spilt plot design, with four levels of irrigation water depths (40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the plant water requirement) in the ...
Read More
In this research, the effect of different levels of irrigation water, nitrogen fertilizer, and cow manure on garlic was investigated. The experiments were carried out in a split-spilt plot design, with four levels of irrigation water depths (40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the plant water requirement) in the main plots, three levels of nitrogen (50, 75 and 100% nitrogen) in the sub- plots, and three levels of manure (25, 32.5 and 50 ton/ha cow manure) in the sub-plots. Nitrogen was applied in two stages and cow manure in one stage before planting. At the end of the experiment, parameters such as plant height, weight, and number of garlic, yield, and irrigation water productivities were measured. The results showed that the effects of irrigation water, nitrogen fertilizer, and manure were significant (p< 1% and <5%) on all parameters. The highest yield was obtained from 100% fertilizer application and 100% water requirement, but no significant effect was observed between treatments of 100 and 80% of water requirement. The highest amount of irrigation water utilization was obtained at irrigation level of 60% and fertilizer level of 100% (1.48 kg/m3/ha). In this regard, there was no significant difference between treatments of 60% and 80% of water requirements. The amount of allicin was reduced by reducing irrigation water and reducing fertilizer use. Increasing nitrogen fertilizer up to 75% of fertilizer requirement, amounting to 150 kg/ha, resulted in increase of allicin, but higher amounts resulted in decrease of allicin content. Therefore, due to shortage of water in the region, irrigation of this crop can be done with 80% of the plant's water requirement, without a significant effect on the yield.
Pooya Aalaee Bazkiaei; Behnam Kamkar; Ebrahim Amiri; Hossin Kazemi; Mojtaba Rezaei
Abstract
This study was carried out to investigate the effects of irrigation intervals and different planting dates on the yield and yield components of rice. A split-plot design based on randomized complete block design was used with three replications, at Rice Research Institute of Iran (Rasht) in 2016 and ...
Read More
This study was carried out to investigate the effects of irrigation intervals and different planting dates on the yield and yield components of rice. A split-plot design based on randomized complete block design was used with three replications, at Rice Research Institute of Iran (Rasht) in 2016 and 2017. The main factor was irrigation at four levels (full flooding, 5, 10 and 15 days irrigation intervals) and the secondary factor was planting date at three levels (April 21, May 11, and May 31). The results of analysis of variance showed that irrigation and planting date had a significant effect on the yield of rice at 1% probability level. The highest amount of biological yield was obtained in full flooding and 5-day irrigation interval, with an average of 10960 and 10238 kg/ha, respectively, and in May 11 and April 21 planting dates with an average of 10553 and 10397 kg/ha, respectively. The highest 100-grain weight was obtained in May 11 and May 31 planting dates, the maximum number of panicle per plant was observed in full flooding treatment, and in May 11 planting date and the highest number of filled grains was observed in full flooding treatment. The maximum number of hollow grains was observed in 15 and 10-day irrigation intervals and May 31 planting date. The results showed that the full flooding irrigation with a yield of 4271 kg/ha had the highest grain yield. The 10 and 15 days irrigation intervals had less grain yield than flood treatment and 5-day irrigation interval treatments. In two years of the experiment, the planting date of May 11 had the highest grain yield with an average of 3820 kg/ha. In this experiment, the May 11 planting date had the most favorable environmental conditions for growth and had a good yield-stability.
Mohammad Zounemat Kermani; rasool asadi
Abstract
Considering the limited water resources in arid and semi-arid climate of Iran, deficit irrigation is one of the strategies for efficient use of water and increasing water use efficiency in agricultural districts. In order to study the effects of deficit irrigation on the quantitative traits of ...
Read More
Considering the limited water resources in arid and semi-arid climate of Iran, deficit irrigation is one of the strategies for efficient use of water and increasing water use efficiency in agricultural districts. In order to study the effects of deficit irrigation on the quantitative traits of Thymus vulgaris L., an experiment was conducted in Kerman Municipality seedling production station in 2016. The experimental treatments were arranged as randomized complete block design with three replications. The irrigation regimes consisted of full irrigation (FI-100), regulated deficit (RDI75% and RDI55%) and partial root zone drying irrigation (PRD75% and PRD55%). The results showed that the highest herbage dry weight (1670.6 kg/ha) and leaf area index in different stages of growth were produced by full irrigation treatment, while no significant difference between this treatment and PRD75 was observed. Also, the highest number of shoots (64.4) and plant height (39.4 cm) were produced by full irrigation treatment and there was significant difference between this treatment and other treatments. However, the highest water use efficiency (0.66 kg/m3), root fresh weight (4.5 g), root depth (15.8 cm) and root volume (2.8 cm3 per plant) appeared in PRD75. Therefore, 75 percent water replacement in partial root zone drying irrigation treatments, in addition to saving water consumption, provides better use of soil moisture and sunlight. Thus, this treatment can be considered as suitable approach to cope with the water crisis and achieve a sustainable agriculture.
z s; m d; mehdi panahi; E A
Abstract
Effects of six irrigation treatments on vegetative characteristics, yield, and sugar content of sugar beet and water use efficiency were investigated. The experiment was conducted at Aleshtar in Lorestan province during growing seasons of 2014 and 2015, using a randomized complete block design. Irrigation ...
Read More
Effects of six irrigation treatments on vegetative characteristics, yield, and sugar content of sugar beet and water use efficiency were investigated. The experiment was conducted at Aleshtar in Lorestan province during growing seasons of 2014 and 2015, using a randomized complete block design. Irrigation treatments consisted of full irrigation (T1) as the control, T1 +cutting off the last irrigation (T2), 10% higher than the control (T3), 10% less than the control (T4), 20% (T5) and 30% less than the control (T6). The results of combined analysis of variance showed that the effects of different irrigation treatments on leaf area index, tuber dry weight, root yield, biomass, sugar content, sugar yield and water use efficiency on the basis of sugar yield was significant at 1% level. However, their effects on leaf dry weight and water use efficiency on the root yield basis was significant at 5% level. Although there were no significant differences between T2, T3, and T4 treatments in terms of crop vegetative characteristics, root yield, biomass and sugar yield, they increased these characteristics significantly compared to T5 and T6 treatments. Also, the highest water use efficiency on the basis of both root and sugar yield was obtained in T2 and T4 treatments. Therefore, to conserve water in sugar beet production in Lorestan province, decreasing the amount of water up to 10 % at each irrigation during the growing season or cutting off the last irrigation is recommended.
Mohammad Mehdi Nakhjavanimoghaddam; b gh; gh z
Abstract
Recently, the main challenge of agricultural sector is improvement of crop water productivity (CWP). In Iran, unfortunately up to now, determination and analysis of water productivity indicators in agricultural sector has not been considered seriously, which has led to the uncertainty of proper water ...
Read More
Recently, the main challenge of agricultural sector is improvement of crop water productivity (CWP). In Iran, unfortunately up to now, determination and analysis of water productivity indicators in agricultural sector has not been considered seriously, which has led to the uncertainty of proper water consumption in agriculture. This study was aimed to evaluate wheat water productivity under different irrigation managements in Iran and determine the suitable irrigation depth for wheat in situation of water resource limitations. Based on the experiments conducted in eight research stations located in different regions of the country during 1998-2012 for wheat, it was found that the range of CWP was 0.3-1.5 kg m-3 which was wider than that reported earlier by the FAO, i.e. 0.8-1.0 kg m-3. Nevertheless, it is in the range proposed by Zwart and Bastiaanssen in 13 countries from five different continents. The wide ranges of CWP indicate tremendous opportunities for increasing the agricultural productions with less water. The maximum measured wheat water productivity (CWPI) for irrigation water alone and for irrigation+ effective rainfall (CWPI+Re) was 2.1 and 1.5 kg m-3, respectively, in Karaj region, where drip irrigation and deficit irrigation management were applied. Also, the minimum measured wheat CWPI and CWPI+Re was observed in Kerman region under surface irrigation. The maximum measured wheat CWPI and CWPI+Re in Mashhad region was 1.9 and 1.5 kg m-3, respectively, under deficit irrigation management. The results showed that wheat CWPI and CWPI+Re of 1.6 and 1.1 kg m-3 could be considered as the optimum levels in cropping system of Mashhad region. The depths of irrigation water alone and total applied water (irrigation +effective rainfall) for optimum level of wheat CWP under deficit irrigation management were 300 and 420 mm, respectively.
halimeh piri; Hossein Ansari; m p
Abstract
Water stress and salinity are among the problems of agricultural production in many parts of the world. In this study, the effect of salinity (2, 5 and 8 dS/m), different irrigation levels (120%, 100%, 75%, and 50% of water requirement) and three harvesting times (cuttings) were investigated on some ...
Read More
Water stress and salinity are among the problems of agricultural production in many parts of the world. In this study, the effect of salinity (2, 5 and 8 dS/m), different irrigation levels (120%, 100%, 75%, and 50% of water requirement) and three harvesting times (cuttings) were investigated on some qualitative and quantitative parameters of sorghum silage in the Sistan region. The study was carried out using a factorial split plot design with 12 treatments and 3 replications. The results showed that increasing salinity and irrigation water depth decreased fresh and dry matter yield. However, no significant difference was observed between 100% and 75% crop water requirement treatments. Also, treatments with 2 and 5 dS/m salinity were not significantly different in feed production. Furthermore, the fresh and dry forage yields were higher in the second cutting than in the first and third harvesting. Decrease in irrigation water and increase in salinity decreased protein but increased carbohydrate and proline. The highest amount of protein (16.79 percent) was obtained in the second harvesting and at the salinity of 2 dS/m, while the highest amount of carbohydrates (10.79 mg/gFW) and proline (0.42 mg/gFW) belonged to the third harvesting with salinity of 8 dS/m. By increasing salinity in irrigation water and with the passage of time during the growing season, soil salinity increased and distribution of salinity in the soil profile was more uniform in the treatments that had no water stress. Thus, according to the results, 25% of the plant water consumption can be saved and irrigation with 75% of water requirement and salinity of 5 dS/m would have no significant effect on the amount of forage produced. The best forage quality for livestock consumption was obtained in the second harvesting. However, this experiment was done in one growing season and in the long time reduction in the amount of water and the use of salt water can cause soil salinization and accumulation of salts in the soil. Therefore, it is recommended that the experiment be repeated in the future, before making a final decision about reducing irrigation water.
s h; m kh; m m
Abstract
Considering water resources deficiency, optimum use of water is very important and has led to recognition of the significance of water productivity. This study was carried out for evaluation of three irrigation systems including surface, subsurface tape drip irrigation and sprinkler irrigation for ...
Read More
Considering water resources deficiency, optimum use of water is very important and has led to recognition of the significance of water productivity. This study was carried out for evaluation of three irrigation systems including surface, subsurface tape drip irrigation and sprinkler irrigation for corn. The experiment was conducted in 2007, 2008, and 2009 at Irstea Research Institute located in Montpellier (southeastern France). Five experimental treatments included surface drip irrigation (full irrigation (FI) and deficit irrigation (DI)), subsurface drip irrigation with lateral spacing of 120 and 160 cm, and sprinkler irrigation. For treatments evaluation, different productivity indices i.e. WP, BPD, NBPD, and B/C were used. Results showed that in 2007 FI was more economical than DI and sprinkler irrigation, and had more net benefit. Grain yield from 13800 kg/ha in sprinkler irrigation increased to 16400 and 17400 kg/ha in DI and FI, respectively. In 2008, subsurface irrigation treatment was better than sprinkler irrigation according to above indices. In 2009, water productivity of subsurface drip irrigation was more than sprinkler irrigation, but none of treatments had net benefit. In 2008 and 2009, water used in subsurface drip irrigation decreased at least 16% and grain yield increased at least 18% as compared with sprinkler irrigation. Considering different conditions, such as water resources of Iran, use of subsurface drip irrigation system for row crops such as corn is recommended.
a f; h a; m k; a a; m m
Abstract
Almost all districts of the country are experiencing quantitative and qualitative decline of agricultural water resources. Considering the extensive expansion of greenhouse cultivation and importance of tomato production, and in order to evaluate the combined effect of salinity and drought stress on ...
Read More
Almost all districts of the country are experiencing quantitative and qualitative decline of agricultural water resources. Considering the extensive expansion of greenhouse cultivation and importance of tomato production, and in order to evaluate the combined effect of salinity and drought stress on growth and yield of tomato plant (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill. Cv. Oriental), four levels of irrigation (125% ETc, 100% ETc, 75% ETc and 50% ETc) and six levels of salinity (0.1, 1.3, 3, 5, 7 and 9 dS/m) were factorially combined in a completely randomized design with 3 replication in a greenhouse soilless culture. Yield and its indexes were measured during the crop growing season. As expected, results indicated that salinity of the nutrient solution and drought stress had significant negative effects on yield and growth indexes of plant. Yield data were fitted on different production functions (simple linear, logarithmic linear, quadratic, and transcendental). The results indicated that the simple linear form was the optimum form. The S1W4 treatment (EC= 0.1 dS/m, and 50% ETc) with 34.6 kg/m3 and S5W1 treatment (EC= 7 dS/m, and 125% ETc) with 6.4 kg/m3 had the highest and lowest water use efficiency, respectively. The iso-yield curves showed that by increasing irrigation water amounts, water with higher salinity can be applied without changing the yield.
a f; h a; m k; a a; m m
Abstract
In order to investigate the economics of simultaneous effect of salinity anddrought stress on growth and yield of tomato plant (LycopersiconesculentumMill.Cv. Oriental), four levels of irrigation (125% ET, 100%ET, 75%ET and 50%ET)and six levels of salinity (0.1, 1.3, 3, 5, 7, and 9 dS/m) were combined ...
Read More
In order to investigate the economics of simultaneous effect of salinity anddrought stress on growth and yield of tomato plant (LycopersiconesculentumMill.Cv. Oriental), four levels of irrigation (125% ET, 100%ET, 75%ET and 50%ET)and six levels of salinity (0.1, 1.3, 3, 5, 7, and 9 dS/m) were combined in afactorial and completely randomized design with 3 replication in a greenhousesoilless culture. Economic model of deficit irrigation optimization was extractedand used for growing tomato in a greenhouse under salinity and drought stresses.The results of this model showed that the net profit of full irrigation of tomato insoilless culture in greenhouse using water of 0.1, 1.3, and 3 dS/m was equal to thenet profit of deficit irrigation at 36%, 21%, and 24%, respectively. Thus,considering the large number of tomato greenhouses with soilless production andvery high price of chemical fertilizers and other costs related to plant nutrition andirrigation, applying approximately 25% deficit irrigation will cause acorresponding reduction in total costs of production, which is economicallysignificant.
n k; a a; k d
Abstract
Plant yield is a function of root distribution and its activity. Under limited water conditions, adequate root growth and efficiency are essential for crop productivity. To study the relationship between the dynamics of corn (Zea Maize L., variety single cross 704) root growth and soil available water ...
Read More
Plant yield is a function of root distribution and its activity. Under limited water conditions, adequate root growth and efficiency are essential for crop productivity. To study the relationship between the dynamics of corn (Zea Maize L., variety single cross 704) root growth and soil available water uptake under drip-tape irrigation system, an experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Experimental variables were three irrigation treatments including: 100% (I1), 80% (I2), and 60% (I3) of the actual plant water requirement calculated by the Penman–Monteith formula using meteorological data. The roots were collected from the beginning to the end of the growing season at four stages including: 25, 55, 85 and 115 days after planting. Samples were taken from 5 depths: 0-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, and 40-50 cm. The results showed that irrigation treatments had significant effect (p=0.01) on root length density at different depths. About 60% of the corn root length density was up to the depth of 20 cm. On the other hand, the surface layers of the soil at this depth lost their moisture rapidly and, therefore, the plant needed to absorb water from the lower layers (below 20 cm) to survive. In low irrigation treatment (60% water requirement) up to the depth of 40 cm, root growth was low and, as a result, water absorption was also low. Higher irrigation had a positive effect on corn yield as the highest yield (7769 kg/ha) was obtained with the irrigation treatment of 100% water requirement.
Abdolhamid Mohebi; Majid Alihouri
Abstract
In recent years, larg parts of agricultural lands in the country have been at the risk of degradation because of quantative and qualitative limitations of water resources and soil salinization. Therefore, to increase plant yield per unit of consumed water, proper planning and selection of adaptable irrigation ...
Read More
In recent years, larg parts of agricultural lands in the country have been at the risk of degradation because of quantative and qualitative limitations of water resources and soil salinization. Therefore, to increase plant yield per unit of consumed water, proper planning and selection of adaptable irrigation method for optimum use of the limited water resources is necessary. This study was carried out in randomized complete blocks design with four treatments and three replications at Haji Abad Agricultural Research Station during four years. The treatments of irrigation included surface (basin) and drip irrigation with irrigation depth equal to 75% and 100% net irrigation requirement based on cumulative evaporation from class A pan. The results showed that effects of irrigation treatments on fruit yield, leaf number, leaflet number, trunk perimeter, and plant canopy area were not significant, probably because the applied water based on pan evaporation was more than the actual plant water requirement. But, there was significant difference between water productivity, at 1% probability level. The maximum and minimum water productivity values were obtained in drip irrigation with irrigation depth equal to 75% and in the basin irrigation with a depth equal to 100% of the cumulative evaporation from the class A pan, respectively. The drip irrigation treatment with irrigation depth of 75% of cumulative evaporation from the class A pan is recommendable for date palm plantations.
davod Akbari Nodehi; Aliakbar Azizizohan; Reza Rezaee
Abstract
In order to study the effects of deficit irrigation on tomato yield and to determine the production function and water use efficiency, an experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design in three replications for two years, in Mazandaran province. Irrigation treatments were based on ...
Read More
In order to study the effects of deficit irrigation on tomato yield and to determine the production function and water use efficiency, an experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design in three replications for two years, in Mazandaran province. Irrigation treatments were based on 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100% of water requirements. The minimum and maximum yield belonged to I0 and I100 treatments. Water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency in I100 treatment was significantly higher than the other treatments. The results showed that the maximum yield of tomato occurred when full water requirement was provided. Therefore, I100 treatment with 5635 m3.ha-1 of water consumption and tomato yield of 45,020 kg.ha-1 was the best treatment and can be recommended to farmers where water resources are not limited. Water use efficiency (WUE) and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) were in the range of 5-9.25 and 9.2-14.6 kg m-3, respectively. The two-year average of yield response factor (Ky) for tomato was 1.18.
Masoud Mohammadi; Hossin Molavi; Abdolmajid Liaghat; Masoud Parsinejad
Abstract
Salinity and water stress are the main problems of agricultural production in many parts of the world, especially in arid and semi-arid areas. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of Zeolite application under salinity and ...
Read More
Salinity and water stress are the main problems of agricultural production in many parts of the world, especially in arid and semi-arid areas. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of Zeolite application under salinity and water stress conditions on yield and yield components of Corn in Karaj, Iran. A factorial design with randomized complete block arrangement was used with three replications including three factors: salinity, irrigation water, and Zeolite application. Irrigation water, salinity and Zeolite application factors consisted of two levels each:W1=100% and W2=50% of crop water requirement; S1=0.7, S2=5 dS/m, and Z1=0 and Z2=10 t/ha, respectively. The soil texture was clay loam. Results showed that salinity and water stresses reduced yield and yield components, while Zeolite application increased them. Simultaneous impact of salinity, deficit irrigation, and Zeolite application had significant effect on corn yield, the 1000 kernels weight, number of grains per ear, and plant height. The maximum corn yield, 1000 seeds weight, number of grains per ear, and plant height were, respectively, 7233.3 kg/ha, 309 g, 504, and 220.7 cm and corresponded to W1S1Z2 treatment, while the minimum corn yield, 1000 seeds weight, number of grains per ear and plant height were 2296 kg/ha, 101.7 g, 159, and 146.3 cm, respectively, and belonged to W2S2Z1 treatment. The maximum water use efficiency (1.41 kg/m3) and its minimum (0.68 kg/m3) were observed in W2S1Z2 and W1S2Z1 treatments, respectively.
Shahram Karimi; Rasoul Asadi; Mohammadeza Mohammadrezakhani
Abstract
In order to investigate the effect of deficit irrigation and position patterns tube to increase water use efficiency of cotton, a field experiment was carried out during 2009 and 2010 growing season at experimental farm of Orzoueyeh Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center in Kerman province. ...
Read More
In order to investigate the effect of deficit irrigation and position patterns tube to increase water use efficiency of cotton, a field experiment was carried out during 2009 and 2010 growing season at experimental farm of Orzoueyeh Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center in Kerman province. The treatments were laid out in strip split plot a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The treatments were comprised of three levels of irrigation including 100, 80, 60 percent of crop water requirement in main plot and sub plot consisted of two irrigation systems (surface drip irrigation system (S1), subsurface drip irrigation system (S2)) and two tape position patterns (conventional (L1) and alternative (L2)). The results showed that In comparison with 100 percent of crop water requirement, 80 percent of water requirement caused parsimony of water usage equal 1300 m3 ha-1, and yield, WUE, number of bolls per plant and bolls weight increased 8.5%, 4%, 10% and 2.5% respectively. Also I3 compared with I1 savin about 3400 m3 ha-1 of irrigation water, and increase WUE was 8% but yield loss, number of bolls per plant and bolls weight decreased 18%, 25% and 18% respectively. Considering the results obtained in this study in the light of water saving as the main object in deficit irrigation and water use efficiency (WUE) for cotton cultivation in Orzoueyeh, the 80% of crop water requirement on subsurface drip irrigation is preferred.
Niazali Ebrahimipak; M MOSTASHARI
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of water stress and different amounts of zinc, manganese, and boron fertilizers on yield components and water use efficiency of sugar beet. The experiment was conducted for three years in Qazvin, Iran, with two-factor factorial design in randomized complete block ...
Read More
This study investigated the effect of water stress and different amounts of zinc, manganese, and boron fertilizers on yield components and water use efficiency of sugar beet. The experiment was conducted for three years in Qazvin, Iran, with two-factor factorial design in randomized complete block and three replicates including irrigation and fertilizer treatments. Irrigation treatments consisted of four intervals i.e. 6, 9, 12 and 15 days (treatments E1 to E4) and fertilizer levels included fertilizers based on soil test (30 kg boric acid/ ha , 40 kg zinc sulfate / ha and 30 kg manganese sulfate /ha,), 30 percent less than the recommended fertilizer (21 kg boric acid/ ha ,28 kg zinc sulfate /ha, 21 kg manganese sulfate /ha) and 30 percent more than the recommended fertilizer (39 kg boric acid / ha , 52 kg zinc sulfate /ha and 39 kg manganese sulfate / ha) treatments, respectively, F1, F2, and F3. Statistical analysis of sugar beet root yield showed significant (at 5% level) differences between irrigation treatments and fertilizer treatments. Treatment E1F3 produced a yield of 64696 kg/ ha, while E4F3 produced 41736 kg/ha that was the lowest yield. Average root yield of F2 treatmentswas more, but, in the case of F1, the amount of sugar level was higher. In the wettest irrigation treatment, root yield increased with increasing fertilizer rates. It is suggested that when water stress conditions occur, use of fertilizer in excess of the recommended levels should be avoided. The volumes of irrigation water applied in irrigation intervals of 6, 9, 12 and 15 days were, respectively, 9659, 8104, 6677, and 5398 cubic meters per hectare. Water productivities for irrigation interval of 15 days and F2, F1, and F3 were, respectively, 8.39, 8.38, and 7.73 kg beetroot per cubic meter of water, reflecting the most efficient use of irrigation water.