ali ataee; Mehdi Akbari; Mohammadreza Neyshabouri; zahra ghaffari; Davood Zarehaghi
Abstract
To investigate the effects of substituting surface drip irrigation (DI) by subsurface drip-irrigation systems (SDI) on plant responses, a10 ha pistachio orchard with DI system located in Shahriar, Tehran province, was selected. Irrigation treatments including DI and SDI with saline water and DI with ...
Read More
To investigate the effects of substituting surface drip irrigation (DI) by subsurface drip-irrigation systems (SDI) on plant responses, a10 ha pistachio orchard with DI system located in Shahriar, Tehran province, was selected. Irrigation treatments including DI and SDI with saline water and DI with non-saline water (A) were established and plant responses were measured. The salinity distribution results showed that, in DI, at depth of 30-50 cm and distance of 70-100 cm, salts were accumulated. In SDI, salt accumulation was observed in surface layer and in distance of 60-80 cm from the tree. Based on all plant response indicators, treatment A showed significantly more favorable conditions. Unlike treatment A, there was no significant difference in the “canopy temperature” and “canopy–air temperature difference” between DI and SDI. By normalization of environmental-effects on foliage temperature, crop water stress index (CWSI) showed significant differences between DI and SDI treatments. Also, stomata conductance in SDI was significantly greater than DI. Additionally, treatment A had significantly the highest sap flow (SF). Based on SF measurement in 24 hour, there were no significant differences between DI and SDI irrigation systems, but the mean of this index for daylight time and midday, showed significant differences. With equal depth of irrigation water applied to DI and SDI and more favorable salinity distribution in root zone of SDI, this treatment leads to less water and salinity stress. Although the use of subsurface drip irrigation system requires long-term studies, but in view of the observed plant responses and in terms of soil salinity distribution, it is recommended to use SDI in pistachio trees.
Mehri Saeedinia; Seyed Hamzeh Hosseinian; Farhad Beiranvand; Ali Heydar Nasrollahi
Abstract
Considering the great value of water, irrigation scheduling, and cultivation of medicinal plants, this research was conducted at the Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, with the aim of scheduling irrigation of summer savory using CWSI and applying different levels of water stress under the condition ...
Read More
Considering the great value of water, irrigation scheduling, and cultivation of medicinal plants, this research was conducted at the Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, with the aim of scheduling irrigation of summer savory using CWSI and applying different levels of water stress under the condition of pot planting. In this research, seeds of summer savory were cultivated with three replications under four irrigation treatments of 100%, 80%, 60%, and 40% of readily available water (RAW) (IR100, IR80, IR60 and IR40). Irrigation of the control treatment (IR100) was carried out when all the soil RAW was depleted. Irrigation of the other three treatments was carried out at the same time but with, respectively, 80%, 60%, and 40 percent of the volume applied to IR100. The canopy cover temperature in IR100 and air temperature (dry and wet) were measured on the day after (8-14 o’clock) and before irrigation (12-15 o’clock) in order to construct the lower and upper limits base lines required to calculate CWSI. According to the result, the upper base line equation is (𝑇𝑐-𝑇𝑎) UL = 0.69, and the lower base line is (𝑇𝑐-𝑇𝑎) LL = 0.2787 - 0.1134 (VPD). Result showed that the effect of water stress on yield was significant. The highest yield was observed in IR100 (1.756 g / plant) and the lowest yield was observed in IR40 (1.421 g / plant). The crop water stress index (CWSI) of the four treatments in the day before irrigation was 0.19, 0.21, 0.28, and 0.46, respectively. According to this information, the permissible CWSI index for irrigation scheduling of summer savory growing in pots was 0.19. The result of means comparison indicated that differences between IR100 and IR80 in values of CWSI and canopy cover temperature were not significant, but they were significant between IR100, IR60 and IR40. The increment of CWSI in IR80, IR60 and IR40 were 10%, 47%, and 142 percent relative to the IR100. In this research, a strong correlation (r= -0.978*) was obtained between CWSI and stomatal conductance.